Multimodal discourse analysis

Document Type : Tarviji

Authors
1 PhD Student
2 university of Tehran
Abstract
The history of discourse analysis is beset by a vagueness around the homonym ‘discourse’. The term names a large territory, located somewhere between two ‘markers’, which might, generally speaking, be something like ‘providing accounts of connected stretches of language in use’ and ‘uncovering salient social, political, psychological features in text-like entities’. In sociolinguistics, by and large, the major emphasis has been on understanding the link between (environments of) language use and (features of) the language used . In such work, ‘the social’ and its meanings and effects are foregrounded: who speaks, to whom, when, with what purposes, in what ways. These factors and the purposes leave traces – whether the details of pronunciation in Labov’s early work or the regularity of use of a certain range of linguistic resources, leading to the development of the notion of ‘codes’ in Bernstein’s theory.
In more linguistically rather than sociolinguistically or sociologically oriented approaches, the emphasis has been on seeing whether regularities of a ‘formal’ kind could be discerned in ‘stretches’ of speech and writing ‘above’ the sentence, somewhat akin to those that linguistics had been able to establish in relation to the sentence in the 1970s – whether in mid-century American structuralism or in Chomskyan conceptions of the organization of language at or below the level of the sentence.

Keywords


منابع
- Bernstein, B. (1984) Class, Codes and Control: Theoretical Studies Towards a Sociology of Language. Vol.1. London, Routledge and Kegan Paul.
- Bezemer, J. and Kress, G. (2008) ‘Writing in multimodal texts: a social semiotic account of designs for learning’, Written Communication, 25 (2): 166–195 (Special Issue on Writing and New Media).
- Bezemer, J. and Kress, G. (2009) ‘Visualizing English: a social semiotic history of a school subject’, Visual Communication, 8: 247–262 (Special Issue on Information Environments).
- Brown, R. and Gilman, A. (1968) ‘The pronouns of power and solidarity’, in Thomas A. Sebeok (ed.) Style in Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 253–276.
- Chomsky, N. A. (1957) Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.
- Chomsky, N. A. (1965) Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Harvard, MA: MIT Press.
- Fairclough, N. (1989) Language and Power. London: Longman.
- Fairclough, N. (1992) Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
- Foucault, M. (1981) ‘The Order of discourse’, in R Young (ed.) Untying the Text: A Post-Structuralist Reader. London and New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp. 48–78.
- Fowler, R., Hodge, B., Kress, G., and Trew, T. (eds.) (1979). Language and control. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
- Franks, A. (1995) ‘The Body as a Form of Representation¹, Social Semiotics, 5 (1): 1–21.
- Franks, A. (1997) ‘Drama, desire and schooling’, Changing English, 4 (1): 131–148.
- Franks, A. and Jewitt, C. (2001) ‘The meaning of action in learning and teaching’, British Educational Research Journal, 27 (2): 201–221.
- Gee, J. P. (1999) Introduction to Discourse Analysis. New York: Routledge.
- Gee, J. P. (2008) Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideologies in Discourses. Abingdon: Routledge.
- Gibson, J. J. (1986) The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Gumperz, J. (1982) Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Habermas, J. (1984) The Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
- Halliday, M. A. K. and Hasan, R. (1976) Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
- Hodge, R. and Kress, G. (1988) Social Semiotics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
- Hodge, R. and Kress, G. (1993) Language as Ideology, 2nd edn. London: Routledge.

- D. Hymes, (ed.) (1964) Language in Culture and Society: A Reader in Linguistics and Anthropology. New York: Harper and Row.
- Insulander, E. (2008) ‘The museum as a semi-formal site for learning’. Medien Journal. Lernen. Ein zentraler Begriff für die Kommunikationswissenschaft. 32. Jahrgang. Nr. 1/2008.
- Insulander, E. and Lindstrand, F. (2008) ‘Past and present – multimodal constructions of identity in two exhibitions’, Paper for Comparing National Museums: Territories, Nation-Building and Change, NaMu IV 18–20 February 2008, Linköping University, Norrköping, Sweden.
- Jewitt, C. (2008) Technology, Literacy, Learning. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
- Jewitt, C. (2009) The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
- Jewitt, C. and Kress, G. (2003) ‘Multimodal research in education’, in S. Goodman, T. Lillis, J. Maybin, and N. Mercer (eds.) Language, Literacy and Education: A Reader. Stoke on Trent: Trentham Books /Open University, pp. 277–292.
- Kress, G. R. (1975) ‘Tense as Modality’, UEA Papers in Linguistics, 3.
- Kress, G. R. (1982) Learning to Write. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
- Kress, G. R. (1984/1989) Linguistic Processes in Sociocultural Practices. Geelong: Deakin University Press, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Kress, G. R. (2001) Early Spelling. From Creativity to Convention. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
- Kress, G. R. (2003) Literacy in the New Media Age. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
- Kress, G. R. (2009) ‘What is mode?’, in C. Jewitt (ed.) Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis. London: Routledge, pp. 54–67.
- Kress, G. R. (2010) Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
- Kress, G. and Aers, D. (1982) ‘The politics of style in measure for measure’, Style 16(1): 22–37.
- Kress, G. and Bezemer, J. (2009) ‘Writing in a multimodal world of representation’, in R. Beard,
- D. Myhill, M. Nystrand, and J. Riley (eds.) SAGE Handbook of Writing Development. London: Sage, pp. 167–181.
- Kress, G. R., Bourne, J., Franks, A., Hardcastle, J., Jewitt, C., and Jones, K. (2004) English in Urban Classrooms: A Multimodal Perspective on Teaching and Learning. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
- Kress, G. R. and Hodge, R. I. V. (1979) Language as Ideology. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Volume 11, Issue 42
Spring 2022
Pages 279-310

  • Receive Date 27 October 2021
  • Accept Date 16 July 2022