بازخوانی فرانظری نظریه‌های فرایند خط‌مشی عمومی: تدوین چارچوب مفهومی نوآورانه مبتنی بر ماتریس مینتزبرگ

نوع مقاله : پژوهشی

نویسندگان
غلامحسین محمدی 1
رحمت الله قلی پور سوته 2
غلامرضا کاظمیان 3
1 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشکده پردیس البرز، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.
2 استاد گروه مدیریت دولتی،‌ دانشکده مدیریت دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.
3 دانشیار گروه مدیریت،‌ دانشکده مدیریت دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران
10.22034/scm.2025.508242.1855
چکیده
این مقاله به تحلیل فرایند خط‌مشی عمومی و تطبیق آنها با شرایط بومی ایران پرداخته و چارچوبی مبتنی بر ماتریس مینتزبرگ برای مدیریت شهری ارائه می‌دهد. این تحلیل به دنبال شناسایی کاستی‌های نظریات غربی و بومی‌سازی آنها برای انطباق با محیط نهادی، اجتماعی و سیاسی ایران است. یافته‌ها نشان می‌دهد که نظریات خط‌مشی، علی‌رغم کارآمدی در بسترهای اصلی خود، بدون اصلاح و بازنگری قادر به تبیین پیچیدگی‌های مدیریتی کلان‌شهرهای ایران نیستند. در این پژوهش، با بهره‌گیری از رویکرد اقتضایی، ماتریس مینتزبرگ به‌گونه‌ای تطبیق داده شده که بتواند چالش‌های خاص مدیریت شهری در ایران، از جمله تهران، را پاسخ دهد. این چارچوب با تمرکز بر دو بعد استانداردسازی و تمرکز، ابزاری منعطف برای تحلیل فرایندهای خط‌مشی‌گذاری فراهم آورده است. این چارچوب قادر است نه‌تنها شرایط پیچیده مدیریت شهری را تبیین کند، بلکه راهکارهایی عملی برای طراحی خط‌مشی‌های پایدار و متناسب ارائه دهد. نتایج این پژوهش همچنین بر اهمیت تحلیل میان‌رشته‌ای خط‌مشی‌گذاری در ایران تأکید دارد، به‌گونه‌ای که عناصر جامعه‌شناختی، اقتصادی و نهادی در طراحی و اجرای خط‌مشی‌ها مدنظر قرار گیرند. این مقاله ابزار مفهومی جامعی در اختیار مدیران و سیاست‌گذاران قرار می‌دهد تا با انطباق بهتر تصمیم‌گیری‌ها با شرایط محیطی، به اهداف توسعه پایدار و مدیریت کارآمد شهری دست یابند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

A Meta-Theoretical Review of Public Policy Process Theories: Developing an Innovative Conceptual Framework Based on the Mintzberg Matrix

نویسندگان English

gholamhossin mohammadi 1
Rahmatollah Gholipor Souteh, 2
Gholamreza Kazemian 3
1 PhD Student,Department of Public Administration, Alborz Campus, University Tehran, Tehran,Iran.
2 Prof.Department of Public Administration Faculty of Management University of Tehran,Tehran,Iran.
3 Associate Professor, Department of Management, Faculty of Management, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

This article analyzes the process of public policy-making and its adaptation to the local conditions of Iran, presenting a framework based on Mintzberg's matrix for urban management. The analysis seeks to identify the shortcomings of Western theories and localize them to align with Iran's institutional, social, and political environment. The findings indicate that policy theories, despite their effectiveness in their original contexts, are unable to explain the complexities of managing Iran's metropolitan areas without modification and revision. In this research, using a contingency approach, Mintzberg's matrix has been adapted to address the specific challenges of urban management in Iran, including Tehran. This framework, focusing on the dimensions of standardization and centralization, provides a flexible tool for analyzing policy-making processes. It is capable of not only explaining the complex conditions of urban management but also offering practical solutions for designing sustainable and context-appropriate policies. The results of this study also emphasize the importance of interdisciplinary analysis in policy-making in Iran, ensuring that sociological, economic, and institutional elements are considered in the design and implementation of policies. This article provides policymakers and managers with a comprehensive conceptual tool to better align decision-making with environmental conditions, achieving sustainable development goals and efficient urban management.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Public Policy Process Theories
Conceptual Framework
Innovation in Policy-Making
Mintzberg Matrix
Public Policy

  •  

    • ساباتیه، پل. (۱۳۹۶). نظریه‌های فرآیند خط‌مشی عمومی. (حسن. داتایی فرد، مترجم). تهران: انتشارات صفار
    • هچ، ماری جو. (۱۳۹۳). نظریه سازمان: مدرن، نمادین-تفسیری و پست مدرن. (حسن. داتایی فرد، مترجم). تهران: مؤسسه کتاب مهربان نشر.
    • Berry, Frances.S. and Berry, William.D. (2018). Innovation and Diffusion Models in Policy Research. In C.M. Weible & P.A. Sabatier (Eds.), Theories of the Policy Process (4th ed., pp. 253-297). Routledge.
    • Birkland, Thomas.A. (2019). An Introduction to the Policy Process: Theories, Concepts, and Models of Public Policy Making. Abingdon: Routledge.
    • Bosso, Christopher.J. (1994). Agendas and Instability in American Politics. By Frank R. Baumgartner and Bryan D. Jones. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993. 289p. American Political Science Review, 88(3), 752-753.https://doi.org/10.2307/2944826.
    • Cairney, Paul. (2016). The Politics of Evidence-Based Policy Making. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    • Cairney, Paul. and Heikkila, Tanya. (2014). A Comparison of Theories of the Policy Process. In P.A. Sabatier & C.M. Weible (Eds.), Theories of the Policy Process (3rd ed., pp. 363-390). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
    • Cairney, Paul. and Jones, M.D. (2016). Kingdon's Multiple Streams Approach: What is the Empirical Impact of this Universal Theory? Policy Studies Journal, 44(1), 37-58.
    • Dobbin, Frank., Simmons, Beth. and Garrett, Geoffrey. (2007). The Global Diffusion of Public Policies: Social Construction, coercion, competition, or learning? Annual Review of Sociology, 33, 449-472.
    • Forte, James. A. (2002). Mead, Contemporary Metatheory, and Twenty-First-Century Interdisciplinary Team Work. Sociological Practice, 4(4), 315-334. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020851011396 .
    • Ham, Christopher.and Hill, Michael. (1984). The Policy Process in the Modern State. Brighton: Wheatsheaf Books.
    • Hatch, M. J. (2014). Organization theory: Modern, symbolic-interpretive, and postmodern perspectives. (H. Dataei Fard, Trans.). Tehran: Mehraban Nashr Book Institute. (Original work published 2006) (In Persian)
    • Heikkila, Tanya. and Cairney, Paul. (2018). Comparison of Theories of the Policy Process. In C.M. Weible & P.A. Sabatier (Eds.), Theories of the Policy Process (4th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429494284.
    • Heikkila, Tanya.and Jones, Michael. (2022). How Diverse and Inclusive are Policy Process Theories? Policy & Politics, 50(1), 21-42. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557321X16309516764367.
    • Howlett, Michael., Ramesh, M. and Perl, Anthony. (2009). Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. (4th ed)New York: Oxford University Press.
    • Jones,Bryan.D. and Baumgartner, Frank.R. (2005). The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    • Kershaw, Ian. (1999). Working Towards the Führer: Reflections on the Nature of the Hitler Dictatorship. In C. Leitz (Ed.), The Third Reich: The Essential Readings (pp. 231-252). Oxford: Blackwell.
    • Kingdon, John.W. (1984). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston: Brown and Company.
    • Matheson, Craig. (2009). Understanding the Policy Process: The work of Henry Mintzberg. Public Administration Review, 69, 1148-1161. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.02072.x.
    • Mettler, Suzanne. and Sorelle, Mallory. (2018). Policy Feedback Theory. In C.M. Weible & P.A. Sabatier (Eds.), Theories of the Policy Process (4th ed., pp. 103-134). Routledge.
    • Mintzberg, Henry. (1989). The Structuring of Organizations. London: Macmillan Education.
    • Pierson, Paul. (1993). When Effect Becomes Cause: Policy Feedback and Political Change. World Politics, 45(4), 595-628.
    • Polski, Margaret.M. and Ostrom, Elinor. (1999). An Institutional Framework for Policy Analysis and Design. Policy Studies Journal, 39(3), 535-561.
    • Ritzer, George., Zhao, Shanyang. and Murphy, Jim. (2001). Metatheorizing in Sociology: The Basic Parameters and the Potential Contributions of Postmodernism. In J. H. Turner (Ed.), Handbook of Sociological Theory (pp. 113-131). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-36274-6_6 .
    • Sabatier, P. (2017). Theories of the public policy process. (H. Dataei Fard, Trans.). Tehran: Safar Publications. (Original work published 2014). (In Persian)
    • Sabatier, Paul A. (1991). Toward Better Theories of the Policy Process. PS: Political Science and Politics, 24(2), 147-156. https://doi.org/10.2307/419923.
    • Sabatier, Paul A. (1999). The Need for Better Theories. In P.A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the Policy Process (pp. 3-17). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
    • Sabatier, Paul A. (2007). Theories of the Policy Process. Westview Press, Boulder, CO.
    • Sabatier, Paul A., Jenkins-Smith. and Hank.C. (1999). The Advocacy Coalition Framework: An Assessment. In P.A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the Policy Process (pp. 117-166). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
    • Schlager, Edella. (2007). A Comparison of Frameworks, Theories, and Models of Policy Processes. In P.A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the Policy Process (2nd ed., pp. 293-320). Boulder, CO: Westview Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367274689-10.
    • Schlager, Edella. and Weible, Christopher.M. (2013). Policy Process. Policy Studies Journal, 41, 389-396. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12030.
    • Shanahan, Elizabeth.A., Jones, Michael.D., McBeth. Mark.K. and Radaelli, Claudio.M. (2018). The Narrative Policy Framework. In C.M. Weible & P.A. Sabatier (Eds.), Theories of the Policy Process (pp. 173-203). https://doi.org/10.4324/97804294284-6.
    • Spicer, Michael. (2007). Politics and the Limits of a Science of Government: Some Reflections on the Thought of Bernard Crick. Public Administration Review, 67(4), 768-779. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00759.x.
    • Wallis, Steven. (2010). Toward a Science of Metatheory. Integral Review: A Transdiciplinary and Transcultural Journal for New Thought, Research, and Praxis, 6(3), 48. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2322985.
    • Weible, Christopher.M. and Sabatier, Paul.A. (Eds.). (2018). Theories of the Policy Process (4th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429494284.
    • Weible, Christopher.M., Heikkila, Tanya., DeLeon, Peter. and Sabatier, Paul.A. (2012). Understanding and Influencing the Policy Process. Policy Sciences, 45(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-011-9143-5.
    • Zahariadis, Nikolaos. (2019). The Multiple Streams Framework: Structure, Limitations, Prospects. In C.M. Weible & P.A. Sabatier (Eds.), Theories of the Policy Process (pp. 65-92). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367274689-3.
جامعه فرهنگ رسانه
دوره 14، شماره 54
بهار 1404
صفحه 39-83

  • تاریخ دریافت 05 اسفند 1403
  • تاریخ بازنگری 25 اسفند 1403
  • تاریخ پذیرش 25 فروردین 1404