پژوهش بوردیو در زمینۀ ادبیات: زمینه‎ها، سهم‌ها و نگرش‌ها

نوع مقاله : علمی

نویسنده
گروه علوم اجتماعی، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران
چکیده
مقولۀ ادبیات در آثار بوردیو ، جایگاه بسیار مهمی به خود اختصاص داده است: مفهوم میدان او برای اولین بار ‏دربارۀ ادبیات به‌کار رفت. در حالی‌که جامع‌ترین و نظام‌مندترین، نظریۀ پردازی‌‎اش دربارۀ مفهوم میدان در کتاب ‏قواعد هنر ‏ دیده می‌شود؛ این کتاب به ادبیات و هنر می‌پردازد. به راستی چه تبیینی می‌توان برای ارتباط و ‏مناسبتِ این موارد با مطالعۀ نظری بوردیو در نظر گرفت؟ علاقۀ بوردیو به هنر و ادبیات در نگاه اول شاید تا ‏اندازه‌ای، تعجب‌آور و دور از ذهن به نظر برسد اگر جامعه‌شناسی فرهنگ بوردیو را در محدودترین و ‏سخت‌گیرانه‌ترین معنا، صرفاً جنبه‌ای از مطالعۀ وسیع‌تر او دربارۀ نظریۀ عام «جهان اجتماعی» قلمداد کند.‏در بخش اول این مقاله برای تبیین اینکه چرا بوردیو این موارد را انتخاب کرد‎ ‎و زمینۀ ملی و بین‌المللی را که از خلال آن، ‏نظریه‌اش ساخته شده است، بررسی خواهیم کرد. من نشان خواهم داد که در فضای روشنفکری فرانسه و به‌طور خاص در این ‏دوره، ادبیات، موضوعِ (پدیده) نظریِ محوری‌ای بوده است. در زمینۀ بین‌المللی نیز توجهی که به ادبیات مبذول می‌شود، از طریقِ ‏اهمیت پدیده‌ها به لحاظ نمادین در سنت نظری معاصر توجیه می‌شود.‏

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله English

Bourdieu’s Work on Literature Contexts, Stakes and Perspectives

نویسنده English

Arash Hasanpour
Department of Social Sciences, Faculty of Literature and Human Sciences, Isfahan University, Isfahan, Iran
چکیده English

LITERATURE HOLDS a very important place in Pierre Bourdieu’s
work: his notion of field was first applied to literature, while the most
complete and systematic presentation of his theory of fields is to be
found in The Rules of Art, a work devoted to art and literature. What explanation
can be given for the relevance of these objects to Bourdieu’s theoretical
work? His interest in art and literature may appear somewhat
surprising and improbable at first sight when one considers that for Bourdieu
the sociology of culture, in the strictest sense of the term, was just one aspect
of a much vaster project: a general theory of the ‘social world’.
In order to explain Bourdieu’s choice of object, in the first part of this
article I will consider the national and international context within which
his theory has been built. I will show that in the French intellectual space,
particularly in that period, literature was a central theoretical object. In the
international context, the attention paid to literature was justified by the
importance given to the symbolic phenomena in the main contemporary
theoretical traditions.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Bourdieu
literature
Field theory

 

Apollinaire, G. (1977) OEuvres en prose I. Paris: Gallimard.
Aron, R. (1955) L’opium des intellectuels. Paris: Calmann-Lévy.
Barthes, R. (1964) Sur Racine. Paris: Seuil.
Barthes, R. (1967) Système de la mode. Paris: Seuil.
Bénichou, P. (1973) Le Sacre de l’écrivain. Paris: José Corti.
Boschetti, A. (1985) Sartre et ‘Les Temps modernes’. Paris: Minuit
Boschetti, A. (1988) The Intellectual Enterprise. Sartre and ‘Les Temps modernes’.Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1966) ‘Champ intellectuel et projet créateur’, Les Temps modernes 246:865–906.
Bourdieu, P. (1967) ‘Système d’enseignements et systèmes de pensée’, Revue international des sciences sociales XIX(3): 367–88.
Bourdieu, P. (1968) ‘Structuralism and Theory of Sociological Knowledge’, Social Research XXV(4): 681–706.
Bourdieu, P. (1971a) ‘Champ du pouvoir, champ intellectuel et habitus de classe’, Scolies 1: 7–26.
Bourdieu, P. (1971b) ‘Une interprétation de la théorie de la religion selon Max Weber’, Archives européennes de sociologie 12(1): 3–21.
Bourdieu, P. (1971c) ‘Genèse et structure du champ religieux’, Revue française de sociologie 12(3): 295–334.
Bourdieu, P. (1972) ‘Les doxosophes’, Minuit 1: 26–45.
Bourdieu, P. (1975a) ‘Méthode scientifique et hiérarchie sociale des objets’, Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 1: 4–6.
Bourdieu, P. (1975b) ‘Le couturier et sa griffe. Contribution à une théorie de la magie’, Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 1: 7–36.
Bourdieu, P. (1975c) ‘La spécificité du champ scientifique et les conditions socials du progrès de la raison’, Sociologie et sociétés VII(1): 91–118.
Bourdieu, P. (1976a) ‘Le champ scientifique’, Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 2–3: 88–104.
Bourdieu, P. (1976b) ‘Systems of Education and Systems of Thought’, in R. Dale et al. (eds) Schooling and Capitalism. A Sociological Reader, pp. 192–200. London: Routledge.
Bourdieu, P. (1977) ‘La production de la croyance: contribution à une économie des biens symboliques’, Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 13: 3–43.
Bourdieu, P. (1980a) Le Sens pratique. Paris: Minuit.
Bourdieu, P. (1980d) ‘La fin des intellectuels?’, Noroit 253: 2–8, 17–23; Noroit 254: 2–8, 17–19.
Bourdieu, P. (1984a) Homo academicus. Paris: Minuit.
Bourdieu, P. (1984b) ‘Le plaisir de savoir’, Le Monde 27(juin): 1, 10.
Bourdieu, P. (1984c) ‘Non chiedetemi chi sono. Un profilo di Michel Foucault’,L’Indice 1: 4–5.
Bourdieu, P. (1985a) ‘Les intellectuels et les pouvoirs’, in Michel Foucault, une histoire de la vérité, pp. 93–4. Paris: Syros.
Bourdieu, P. (1985b) ‘The Genesis of the Concept of Habitus and Field’, Sociocriticism 2: 11–24.
Bourdieu, P. (1987a) ‘The Historical Genesis of a Pure Aesthetic’, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism XLVI: 201–10.
Bourdieu, P. (1987b) Choses dites. Paris: Minuit.
Bourdieu, P. (1987c) ‘Für eine Realpolitik der Vernunft’, in S. Müller-Rolli (ed.) Das Bildungswesen der Zukunft, pp. 229–34. Stuttgart: Ernst Klett.
Bourdieu, P. (1987d) ‘Legitimation and Structured Interest in Weber’s Sociology of Boschetti – Bourdieu’s Work on Literature 151 Religion’, in S. Whimster and S. Lash (eds) Max Weber: Rationality and Modernity, pp. 119–36. London: Allen & Unwin.
Bourdieu, P. (1988a) ‘Flaubert’s Point of View’, Critical Inquiry 14(3): 539–62.
Bourdieu, P. (1988b) Homo Academicus. Cambridge: Polity.
Bourdieu, P. (1989a) ‘The Corporatism of the Universal: The Role of Intellectuals in the Modern World’, Telos 8: 99–110.
Bourdieu, P. (1989b) ‘Les conditions sociales de la circulation internationale des idées’, Romanistische Zeitschrift für Literaturgeschichte/Cahiers d’histoire des littératures romanes 14(1–2): 1–10.
Bourdieu, P. (1990a) The Logic of Practice. Oxford: Polity.
Bourdieu, P. (1990b) ‘Pour une realpolitik de la Raison’, interview with W. Hiromatsu and H. Imamura, Gendaï Shiso 3: 182–203.
Bourdieu, P. (1991a) ‘Genesis and Structure of the Religious Field’, in C. Calhoun (ed.) Comparative Social Research 13: 1–44.
Bourdieu, P. (1991b) ‘The Peculiar History of Scientific Reason’, SociologicalForum 6(1): 3–26.
Bourdieu, P. (1992) Les Règles de l’art. Paris: Seuil.
Bourdieu, P. (1993a) The Field of Cultural Production. Essays on Art and Literature. Cambridge: Polity.
Bourdieu, P. (1993b) Sociology in Question. London: Sage.
Bourdieu, P. (1993c) ‘The Production of Belief: Contribution to an Economy of Symbolic Goods’, in P. Bourdieu (1993a) The Field of Cultural Production. Essays on Art and Literature, pp. 74–111.
Bourdieu, P. (1994) In Other Words: Essays Toward a Reflexive Sociology. Cambridge: Polity.
Bourdieu, P. (1996a) Sur la télévision. Paris: Raisons d’Agir.
Bourdieu, P. (1996b) The Rules of Art. Cambridge: Polity.
Bourdieu, P. (1998) Meditations Pascaliennes. Paris: Seuil.
Bourdieu, P. (2000a) Pascalian Meditations. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bourdieu, P. (2000b) Les Structures sociales de l’économie. Paris: Seuil.
Bourdieu, P. (2001) Science de la science et réflexivité. Paris: Raisons d’Agir.
Bourdieu, P. (2004) Science of Science and Reflexivity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Bourdieu, P. and L. Boltanski (1976) ‘La production de l’idéologie dominante’, Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 2–3: 3–73.
Bourdieu, P. and D. Eribon (1986) ‘D’abord défendre les intellectuels’, Le Nouvel observateur 12–18 September: 82.
Bourdieu, P. and J.-C. Passeron (1963) ‘Sociologues des mythologies et mythologies de sociologues’, Les Temps modernes 211: 998–1021.
Bourdieu, P. and L.J.D Wacquant (1992) An Invitation to a Reflexive Sociology.Cambridge: Polity.
Brown, N. and I. Szeman (eds) (2000a) Pierre Bourdieu: Fieldwork in Culture. Lanham/Boulder/New York/Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.
Brown, N. and I. Szeman (2000b) ‘Introduction: Fieldwork in Culture’, in N. Brown 152 Theory, Culture & Society 23(6) and I. Szeman (eds) (2000a) Pierre Bourdieu: Fieldwork in Culture, pp. 1–16.Lanham, MD/Boulder/New York/Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.
Brubaker, R. (1985) ‘Rethinking Classical Sociology: The Sociological Vision of Pierre Bourdieu’, Theory and Society 14(6): 745–75.
Cadiot, O. (2002) Retour définitif et durable de l’être aimé. Paris: POL.
Chartier, R. and H.-J. Martin (eds) (1985–87) L’Histoire de l’édition française, 4 vols. Paris: Promodis.
Clavel, M. and P. Sollers (1977) Délivrance. Paris: Seuil.
Compagnon, A. (1998) Le Démon de la théorie. Littérature et sens commun. Paris:Seuil.
Cook, R. (2000) ‘The Mediated Manufacture of an “Avant-garde”: A Bourdieusian Analysis of the Field of Contemporary Art in London, 1997–9’, in B. Fowler (ed.) Reading Bourdieu on Society and Culture, pp. 164–85. Oxford: Blackwell.
Couldry, N. (2004) ‘Media Meta-capital: Extending the Range of Bourdieu’s Field Theory’, in D. Swartz and V. Zolberg (eds) After Bourdieu. Influence, Critique, Elaboration, pp. 165–89. Dordrecht/Boston, MA/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Debray, R. (1975) Les rendez-vous manqués.
Deleuze, G. (1967) Proust et les signes. Paris: PUF.
Durkheim, E. (1977) The Evolution of Educational Thought. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Durkheim, E. (2001) The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. Oxford: University Press.
Ekelund, B.G. (2000) ‘Space, Time and John Gardner’, in N. Brown and I. Szeman (eds) Pierre Bourdieu: Fieldwork in Culture, pp. 215–40. Lanham, MD/Boulder/New York/Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.
Garnham, N. and R. Williams (1980) ‘Pierre Bourdieu and the Sociology of Culture’, Media, Culture and Society 2: 209–23.
Gerhards, J. and H.K. Anheier (1989) ‘The Literary Field: An Empirical Investigation of Bourdieu’s Sociology’s of Art’, International Sociology 4(2): 131–46.
Goldmann, L. (1956) Le Dieu caché. Paris: Gallimard.
Grignon, C. (1976) ‘Tristes topiques’, Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 1: 66–77.
Guillory, J. (2000) ‘Bourdieu’s Refusal’, in N. Brown and I. Szeman (eds) Pierre Bourdieu: Fieldwork in Culture, pp. 19–43. Lanham, MD/Boulder/New York/Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.
Hall, S. (1978) ‘The Hinterland of Science: Ideology and the “Sociology of Knowledge”’, in On Ideology. London: CCCS/Hutchinson.
Héran, F. (1987) ‘La seconde nature de l’habitus. Tradition philosophique et sens commun dans le langage sociologique’, Revue française de sociologie 28(3):385–416.
Hipsky, M. (2000) ‘Romancing Bourdieu: A Case Study in Gender Politics in the Literary Field’, in N. Brown and I. Szeman (eds) Pierre Bourdieu: Fieldwork in Culture, pp. 186–206. Lanham, MD/Boulder/New York/Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.
Hooker, R., D. Paterson and P. Stirton (2000) ‘Bourdieu and Art Historians’, in B. Fowler (ed.) Reading Bourdieu on Society and Culture, pp. 212–28. Oxford: Blackwell. Boschetti – Bourdieu’s Work on Literature 153
Jurt, J. (2002) ‘Vu d’Allemagne: les théories littéraires en France’, in E. Pinto (ed.) Penser l’art et la culture avec les sciences sociales, pp. 121–37. Paris: Publications de la Sorbonne.
Lebaron, F. (2004) ‘Pierre Bourdieu: Economic Models Against Economism’, in D. Swartz and V. Zolberg (eds) After Bourdieu. Influence, Critique, Elaboration, pp. 87–101. Dordrecht/Boston, MA/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Lévi-Strauss, C. (1962) Le totémisme aujourd’hui. Paris: PUF.
Lévi-Strauss, C. (1963) Totemism. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Lopes, P. (2000) ‘Pierre Bourdieu’s Fields of Cultural Production: A Case Study of Modern Jazz’, in N. Brown and I. Szeman (eds) Pierre Bourdieu: Fieldwork in Culture, pp. 165–85. Lanham, MD/Boulder/New York/Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.
Lukács, G. (1949) Goethe et son époque, trans. L. Goldmann and N. Frank. Paris: Nagel.
Lukács, G. (1960) Histoire et conscience de classe. Paris: Minuit.
Lukács, G. (1963) Théorie du roman, with postface by L. Goldmann. Genève:Gonthier.
Mauger, G. (1995) ‘L’engagement sociologique’, Critique 579–80: 674–96.
Mauron, C. (1957) L’Inconscient dans l’oeuvre et la vie de Jean Racine. Paris: Ophirys.
Mauss, M. (2001) General Theory of Magic. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Picard, R. (1956) La Carrière de Jean Racine. Paris: Gallimard.
Picard, R. (1965) Nouvelle Critique ou nouvelle imposture. Paris: Pauvert.
Pinto, L. (1984) L’Intelligence en action: ‘Le Nouvel Observateur’. Paris: Métailié.
Pinto, L. (1991) ‘Tel Quel. Au sujet des intellectuels de parodie’, Actes de larecherche en sciences sociales 89: 66–77.
Pinto, L. (2002) Pierre Bourdieu et la théorie du monde social. Paris: Seuil.
Pizanias, C. (2000) ‘Habitus Revisited Notes and Queries from the Field’, in N. Brown and I. Szeman (eds) Pierre Bourdieu: Fieldwork in Culture, pp. 145–64.Lanham, MD/Boulder/New York/Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.
Pollak, M. (1976) ‘La planification des sciences sociales’, Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 2–3: 105–21.
Poulet, G. (1949) Études sur le temps humain. Paris: Plon.
Poulet, G. (1971) La conscience critique. Paris: Corti.
Prior, N. (2000) ‘A Different Field of Vision: Gentlemen and Players in Edinburgh, 1826–1851’, in B. Fowler (ed.) Reading Bourdieu on Society and Culture,pp. 142–63. Oxford: Blackwell.
Renan, E. (1868) Questions contemporaines. Paris: Calmann-Lévy.
Robbins, D. (2000a) Bourdieu and Culture. London: Sage.
Robbins, D. (2000b) ‘The English Intellectual Field in the 1790s and the Creative Project of Samuel Taylor Coleridge – An Application of Bourdieu’s Cultural Analysis’, in B. Fowler (ed.) Reading Bourdieu on Society and Culture, pp. 186–98.
Sartre, J.-P. (1943) L’Etre et le néant. Paris: Gallimard.
Sartre, J.-P. (1946) Baudelaire. Paris: Gallimard, trans. (1967) Baudelaire. New York: New Directions Pub. Corp.
154 Theory, Culture & Society 23(6)
Sartre, J.-P. (1947) Situations I. Paris: Gallimard.
Sartre, J.-P. (1952) Saint Genet, comédien et martyr. Paris: Gallimard.
Sartre, J.-P. (1957) ‘Questions de méthode’, Les Temps modernes 139: 228–417, and Les Temps modernes 140: 658–98.
Sartre, J.-P. (1960) ‘Question de méthode’, in Critique de la raison dialectique. Paris: Gallimard, trans. (1963) Search for a Method. New York: Knopf.
Sartre, J.-P. (1964a) Les Mots. Paris: Gallimard.
Sartre, J.-P. (1964b) The Words. New York: G. Braziller.
Sartre, J.-P. (1964c) Saint Genet: Actor and Martyr. Toronto: New American Library of Canada.
Sartre, J.-P. (1971) L’Idiot de la famille, vols. 1 and 2. Paris: Gallimard.
Sarte, J.-P. (1972) Being and Nothingness. London: Routledge.
Stabile, C.A. (2000) ‘Resistance, Recuperation, and Reflexivity: The Limits of a Paradigm’, in N. Brown and I. Szeman (eds) Pierre Bourdieu: Fieldwork in Culture, pp. 44–64. Lanham, MD/Boulder/New York/Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.
Starobinski, J. (1971) La Transparence et l’obstacle. Paris: Gallimard.
Wacquant, L.J.D. (1993) ‘Bourdieu in America: Notes on the Transatlantic Importation of Social Theory’, in C. Calhoun, E. LiPuma and M. Postone Bourdieu Critical Perspectives. Oxford: Polity.
Weber, M. (1988) Economy and Society. New York: Bedminster Press.

  • تاریخ دریافت 02 تیر 1400
  • تاریخ بازنگری 19 مرداد 1400
  • تاریخ پذیرش 07 شهریور 1400