Polarization, Partisanship and Junk News Consumption on Social Media During the 2018 US Midterm Elections

Authors
1 Allameh Tabatabai University, Department of Journalism
2 Allameh Tabataba'i University
Abstract
In the United States, social media platforms serve significant volumes of junk political news and information
during important moments in political life—particularly elections. In this data memo, we examine the sources of
political news and information that were shared by social media users in the period leading up to the 2018 US
midterms, evaluate the sources, and identify the primary audiences for content that is sensational, extremist,
conspiratorial or that has other qualities of junk news. Analyzing 2.5 million tweets and 6,986 Facebook pages
over a 30-day period, we find that (1) the amount of junk news in circulation over social media is greater than it
was during the 2016 US presidential election, with users sharing more junk news than professional news overall,
(2) junk news once consumed by President Trump’s support base and the far-right is now being consumed by
more mainstream conservative social media users, and that (3) less than five percent of the sources referenced on
social media are from public agencies, experts, or the political candidates themselves.

Keywords


 
1. Kollanyi, B., Kollanyi, B. & Woolley, S. C. Bots and Automation over Twitter during the U.S. Election. 5 (Project on Computational Propaganda, Oxford Internet Institute, Oxford University, 2016).
2. Howard, P. N., Kollanyi, B., Bradshaw, S. & Neudert, L.-M. Social Media, News and Political Information during the US Election: Was Polarizing Content Concentrated in Swing States? (Project on Computational Propaganda, Oxford Internet Institute, Oxford University, 2018).
3. Howard, P. N., Bolsover, G., Kollanyi, B., Bradshaw, S. & Neudert, L.-M. Junk News and Bots during the U.S. Election: What Were Michigan Voters Sharing Over Twitter? (Project on Computational Propaganda, Oxford Internet Institute, Oxford University, 2017).
4. Gallacher, J., Barash, V., Howard, P. N. & Kelly, J. Junk News on Military Affairs and National Security: Social Media Disinformation Campaigns Against US Military Personnel and Veterans. (Project on Computational Propaganda, Oxford Internet Institute, Oxford University, 2017).
5. Narayanan, V. et al. Polarization, Partisanship and Junk News Consumption over Social Media in the US. (Project on Computational Propaganda, Oxford Internet Institute, Oxford University, 2018).
6. Howard, P.N. & Woolley, S. Computational Propaganda: Political Parties, Politicians, and Political Manipulation on Social Media. (Oxford University Press, 2018).
7. Barash, K. & Hindman, M. Disinformation, ‘Fake News’ and Influence Campaigns on Twitter. (Knight Foundation, 2018).
8. Neudert, L. M., Kollanyi, B. & Howard, P. N. Junk News and Bots during the German Parliamentary Election: What are German Voters Sharing over Twitter? (Project on Computational Propaganda, Oxford Internet Institute, Oxford University, 2017).
9. Glowacki, M. et al. News and Political Information Consumption in Mexico: Mapping the 2018 Mexican Presidential Election on 7
 
Twitter and Facebook. (Project on Computational Propaganda, Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford, 2018).
10. Machado, C., Kira, B., Hirsch, G. & Marchal, N. News and Political Information Consumption in Brazil: Mapping the 2018 Brazilian Presidential Election on Twitter. (Project on Computational Propaganda, Oxford Internet Institute, Oxford University, 2018).
11. Fruchterman, T. M. & Reingold, E. M. Graph drawing by force-directed placement. Software: Practice and experience 21, 1129–1164 (1991).
12. Kelly, J. & Etling, B. Mapping Iran’s Online Public: Politics and Culture in the Persian Blogosphere. Berkman Center Research Publication No. 2008-01. (Berkman Center 2008).
13. Kelly, J. et al. Mapping Russian Twitter. Berkman Center Research Publication No. 2012-3. (Berkman Center, 2012).
Volume 7, Issue 28
Winter 2019
Pages 145-158

  • Receive Date 19 February 2019