Laboratory Studies in the Sociology of Science: a Cultural Approach to Scientific Production

Authors
Seyed Ali Hashemianfar 1
zahra Maher 2
1 Esfehan University
2 Phd Sociology
Abstract
The emergence of approach laboratory studies in the sociology of science, is the consequence of a cultural turn in epistemology of this area. Rational approach based on a realist epistemology, considered science as a rational phenomenon, universal, non-social, one dimensional and ineffective of socio-cultural interests. But the cultural approach based on socio-cultural epistemology (or epistemological relativism) considered science as a quite social and cultural activity, and that have the fundamental connection with ideologies and socio- cultural values. Laboratory studies have focused on the interactions between the human and material vendors. Based on these studies, scientific activity is essentially local, mixed and accidental, so knowledge cannot be interpreted as an activity that obeys the rules of the scientific method. Laboratory studies of science showed that certain forces sociology and anthropology can enter the laboratory space, and show that there is also a political world filled with treaties negotiated and imposed to advancing to the paths accepted and based on seeing those things that should see them. In this paper, we introduce the tradition of laboratory studies in the sociology of science. And investigated the most important evidence and facts of this tradition in the sociologists of science and technology studies. Thus, we review the history of the laboratory studies, pioneers in this field are introduces (such as Michael Lynch, Karin Knorr-Cetina, Latour and Woolgar). Then, Bath school was considered as one of the main trends in this area, and in the end, the approach of laboratory studies was analyzed.

Keywords

-توکل، محمد. 1387.  جامعه­شناسی معرفت و فرهنگ: تنوع یا تغییر نگرش از کلاسیک به جدید، نامه علوم اجتماعی، شماره  33 :1-22. 
-قانعی راد، محمد امین، 1385، « تعاملات و ارتباطات در جامعه علمی: مطالعه موردی رشته علوم اجتماعی» چاپ اول، تهران، پژوهشکده مطالعات فرهنگی و اجتماعی.
همتی، رضا،1390،مطالعه جامعه شناختی مناسبات علم و. جامعه (بررسی موردی حوزه­های علوم پایه و فنی دانشگاه اصفهان)،پایان­نامه دکتری رشته جامعه­شناسی، دانشگاه اصفهان.
-کنوبلاخ، هوبرت،1390، مبانی جامعه­شناسی معرفت، ترجمه کرامت ا... راسخ، تهران، نشرنی
Bucchi, M (2004), science in society: an introduction to social studies of science, translated by Adrian Belton.
Collins, H. M and pinch, T. (1993). “The Golem: what every one should know about science?” Cambridge: Cambridge university press.
Collins, H. M. (1981), “Knowledge and controversy: studies in modern natural science”, special issue of social studies of science, 11: 1 -158.
Collins, H.M. (1983). An Empirical Relativist programme in the sociology of scientific knowledge’’ , in k. knorr cetina and M. Malkay (eds) science observed, London, sage: 85-113.
Collins, H.M. (1985) changing order, Chicago, university of Chicago press.
Doing, P. (2008). “Give me a Laboratory and I will raise a discipline: The past, present and future policies of Laboratory studies in STS” In Handbook of science and technology studies, 3 nd  ed, ed E.J Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch and J. wajcman. London: MIT press.
Giere, R. (2002). “Discussion note: Distributed cognition in epistemic cultures.” www.google.com.
Knorr Cetina, K, (1981), The manufacture of knowledge: an essay on the constructivist and contextual nature of science.” , Oxford: pergamon.
Knorr Cetina, K, (1995). “Laboratory studies: The cultural approach to the Study of science” In hanb bbook  of science and technology studies, 2 nd ed , ed s.jasanoff, G. Markle, J. C Peterson and T. pinch, 140- 66. Thousand oaks, CA: sage.
Knorr Cetina, K,(2007). “culture in global Knowledge society: knowledge culture and epistemic cultures”, interdisciplinary science Reviews, vol 32, No 4.
Knorr-Cetina,K,(1999). “Epistemic cultures:How the sciences make knowledge”.cambridge maes:Harward university press.
Latour B, Woolgar S. (1979). Laboratory life. Beverly Hills: Sage
Latour, B. (1983). “ Give me a Laboratory and I will raise the world“ In science observed: perspectives on the social study of science, ed. K.D. Knorr cetina and M.Mulkay, 141-70. London; sage.
Lynch, M. (1985), “art and artifact in Laboratory science: a study of shopwork and shoptalk in a research Laboratory” London, Routledge and kegan paul.
Markrosky, B.( 2000). “Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge” (book Review), Contemporary sociology, vol 29, No 3.
Mccarthy, Doyle, (1996). “knowledge as culture : The new sociology of knowledge”, London: Routledge.
   Merton R. (1970) ‘’paradigm for the Sociology of knowledge’’, in Curtis & Petras, The Sociology of knowledge. Reader, New York: op. cit.
   Pickering,A.(1992). “from science as knowledge to science as practice.”in science as practice and culture,ed.A Pickering, Chicago:university of Chicago press,PP1-26
   Pinch, T (1986) ‘’ confronting nature: The sociology of solar Neutrino Detection’’, Dordrecht, the Netherlands: D. Reidel.
Pinch, T,(2000), “Epistemic cultures” (Book Review), American Journal of sociology. Vol 105. lssue 5.
Popper, k (1963), “ conjectures and Refutations: The Grow the of scientific knowledge’’ , London: Routledge and kegan paul.
Woolgar , S.(1992). “ some reme remarks about positionism” , in pickering  (ed), science as practice and culture , 327-342.

  • Receive Date 14 June 2017